Letters to the Editor

< Previous         Next >  
Different developmental potential of pluripotent stem cells generated by different reprogramming strategies Free
Jing Jiang1,†, Guohui Ding2,†, Jiangwei Lin1,†, Man Zhang1, Linyu Shi1, Wenjian Lv1, Hui Yang1, Huasheng Xiao3, Gang Pei1,4, Yixue Li2, Jiarui Wu2,5,*, and Jinsong Li1,*
1Laboratory of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
2Key Laboratory of Systems Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
3National Engineering Center for Biochip at Shanghai, Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park, Shanghai 201203, China
4Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
5State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China *Correspondence to:Jiarui Wu, E-mail: wujr@sibs.ac.cn; Jinsong Li, E-mail: jsli@sibs.ac.cn † These authors contributed equally to this work.
J Mol Cell Biol, Volume 3, Issue 3, June 2011, 197-199,  https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjr012

Recent studies show that induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) generated through ectopic expression of transcription factors retain an epigenetic memory of their original somatic cells (Kim et al., 2010; Polo et al., 2010) or aberrant silencing of a single imprinted gene cluster (Liu et al., 2010; Stadtfeld et al., 2010), which affects their developmental and differentiation potentials. In contrast, nuclear transfer can more faithfully reprogramme somatic cells into embryonic stem (ES) cells (nuclear transfer ES cells, ntESCs) (Brambrink et al., 2006; Wakayama et al., 2006). However, it is still controversial whether reprogramming method per se determines the pluripotency of resulting cells. Here, using genetically identical donor cells, we generated three kinds of mouse reprogrammed cells: iPSCs, ntESCs, and iPSC-nt-ESCs, after successively reprogramming of iPSCs by nuclear transfer. We found that ntESCs had better developmental potential compared with iPSCs, and following nuclear transfer can not rescue, but deteriorate the developmental deficiency of iPSCs, resulting in the worst developmental ability in iPSC-nt-ESCs.